Foros de la Plataforma por una Vivienda Digna :: Ver tema - 10 banks to avoid
Foros de discusión Foros de la Plataforma por una Vivienda Digna
www.viviendadigna.org/foros
Foros abiertos al público para el debate sobre el derecho y la política de vivienda, la economía, etc.
La organización no se responsabiliza, ni avala los comentarios que se hacen libremente en este foro
 
 FAQFAQ   BuscarBuscar   MiembrosMiembros   Grupos de UsuariosGrupos de Usuarios   
 PerfilPerfil   Entre para ver sus mensajes privadosEntre para ver sus mensajes privados   LoginLogin 

10 banks to avoid

 
Publicar nuevo tema   Responder al tema    Foros de discusión -> English speaking message board
Ver tema anterior :: Ver tema siguiente  
Autor Mensaje
billy



Registrado: 15 Oct 2005
Mensajes: 3116

MensajePublicado: Vie Ene 04, 2008 8:07 pm    Asunto: 10 banks to avoid Responder citando

As Citi "creaking" research note says:

Citi picks 10 banks to avoid:



Complete article at Financial Times:

“Involuntary asset growth” and the beginnings of the “true” credit crunch in 2008

Involuntary asset growth, we dare say, could become the next big news catchphrase, for it describes the current crisis facing most banks; massive, uncontrollable increases in troubled, illiquid assets on their balance sheets.

Citi have coined the term in a research note published Friday on European banks; titled simply and ominously, “Creaking”.

For European financial institutions, say Citi’s banking research team, an unwanted €450bn is heading onto (or already on) balance sheets.

Cita:
…whilst the response to the credit crunch might be to force deleveraging across the sector, banks, ironically, are currently facing substantial releveraging pressures. We estimate that the combined effect of ABCP conduits coming onto balance sheets, SIVs being restructured, “hung” leveraged loans and a hiatus in the securitisation market could result in almost €450bn of involuntary RWA growth for the European bank sector.
This is, of course, the broad end of the wedge. On the other end is all that news of CDO super-senior conduits, SIVs going into defeasance and securitisation markets closing.


Involuntary asset growth say Citi, will mark the onset of the “true credit crunch”. And the scale of the crisis is only just becoming known to the banks themselves.

Here’s a fascinating table of what Citi see that risk weighted asset expansion breaking down into (final column, in particular):



Perhaps, obviously, the biggest impact for banks will be the collapse of the securitisation market and the collapse of the ABCP market. But both are worth revisiting, not just for the sake of number crunching, but also to assess the impact for specific banks.

In terms of securitisation, again it’s the UK’s banks which stand to suffer most. The graph below from Citi estimates the current “best guess” of banks’ funding reliance on securitisation:



To read it another way, the above graph demonstrates which business models are going to suffer most - or at least, might need to change most. Of course, this isn’t to say the above will all suffer. Different banks will be trusted for different reasons by ABS investors. And demand for securitised products may well pick up again later this year.

Turning to ABCP markets then (which, as FT Alphaville reported earlier, have perked up a little over the last week). European banks, point out Citi, have a peculiar dependence on ABCP, accounting as they do for 70 per cent of the liquidity backstops in the massive ABCP market:

Cita:
We attribute European banks’ greater appetite for ABCP funding to the regulatory environment they adhere to: European banks - primarily focused on Basel I rules - took advantage of the fact that ABCP back-up lines were allocated a zero risk-weighting. As a consequence, they used self-sponsored ABCP conduits as a capital arbitrage tool to improve the efficiency of their balance sheets. For US banks - where the regulator typically focuses on total, as opposed to risk-weighted, assets - this never held the same attraction since the back-up line was included in the total asset calculation.


In all, along with SIVs coming on to balance sheets and the choking in the leveraged loan pipeline, it’s not looking rosy for the European banks. UBS’s recent recapitalisation, though dramatic, was not a “bolt from the blue” says Citi. The sector is fragile, and the implication is that other banks will have to follow UBS’s lead. In particular, the biggest problems will be felt in two areas: The UK, and the Nordic regions.

Citi picks 10 banks to avoid:



This entry was posted by Sam Jones on Friday, January 4th, 2008 at 12:50 and is filed under Capital markets. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2008/01/04/9916/involuntary-asset-growth-and-the-begginings-of-the-true-credit-crunch-in-2008/?source=rss
_________________
40 propuestas por una Vivienda Digna
Volver arriba
Ver perfil de usuario Enviar mensaje privado
Mostrar mensajes de anteriores:   
Publicar nuevo tema   Responder al tema    Foros de discusión -> English speaking message board Todas las horas son GMT + 1 Hora
Página 1 de 1

 
Cambiar a:  
Puede publicar nuevos temas en este foro
No puede responder a temas en este foro
No puede editar sus mensajes en este foro
No puede borrar sus mensajes en este foro
No puede votar en encuestas en este foro



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2008 phpBB Group