Foros de la Plataforma por una Vivienda Digna :: Ver tema - The US housing bubble: Crash!
Foros de discusión Foros de la Plataforma por una Vivienda Digna
www.viviendadigna.org/foros
Foros abiertos al público para el debate sobre el derecho y la política de vivienda, la economía, etc.
La organización no se responsabiliza, ni avala los comentarios que se hacen libremente en este foro
 
 FAQFAQ   BuscarBuscar   MiembrosMiembros   Grupos de UsuariosGrupos de Usuarios   
 PerfilPerfil   Entre para ver sus mensajes privadosEntre para ver sus mensajes privados   LoginLogin 

The US housing bubble: Crash!

 
Publicar nuevo tema   Responder al tema    Foros de discusión -> English speaking message board
Ver tema anterior :: Ver tema siguiente  
Autor Mensaje
billy



Registrado: 15 Oct 2005
Mensajes: 3116

MensajePublicado: Dom Sep 10, 2006 12:12 am    Asunto: The US housing bubble: Crash! Responder citando

The US housing bubble: Crash!

Is another bubble about to burst?" asked the Economist on May 29, 2003. The answer then was no. In 2003, the bubble was only about to get bigger...

Bill Bonner - Other articles
Fri 08 Sep, 2006



"Is another bubble about to burst?" asked the Economist on May 29, 2003.

The answer then was no. In 2003, the bubble was only about to get bigger.

But the Economist was not too far off. Like the Daily Reckoning, the august weekly was merely too soon.

Three years later, it is no longer too soon.

"US Housing Slump Deepens," signals Bloomberg.

"More US House Prices Falling Below Their Assessed Values," comes the report from Boston.

And now, here is the US Economist again, warning about "the Biggest Bubble in History."

Prices went up further for longer in more places than ever before, says the magazine's cover story. The numbers are formidable.

* The total value of residential property in developed countries rose by more than $30 trillion, to $70 trillion, over the past five years – eclipsing the combined GDPs of those nations.

* Consumer spending and residential construction have accounted for 90 percent of the total growth in the American GDP over the last four years, and more than 40 percent of all private-sector jobs created since 2001 have been in housing-related sectors, including construction and mortgage brokering.

* America made some of its biggest gains this past year, with average prices of homes rising 12.5% in the year and prices in Florida, California, Nevada, Hawaii, Maryland and Washington, DC, rising more than 20 percent, while in Palm Beach County, Florida, it rose over 35%. Sales of existing homes in the US set a new high at 7.18 million in April.

* Some foreign countries showed bigger gains than the US in the last year, with prices up by 23.6 percent in South Africa, 19 percent in Hong Kong and over 15 percent in Spain and France. But average house prices have actually fallen by 7% in Australia since 2003; Sydney's bubblicious prices have plunged by 16%.
In Britain, sales have contracted by a third from last year and have also slowed down in Ireland, the Netherlands and New Zealand. In Britain and Australia, these declines followed what were only very modest interest rate increases.

* 23 percent of all American houses bought last year were for investment and in Miami, one speculation hot spot, 70% of condo buyers are investors/speculators.





* Last year, 42 percent of first-time buyers – and 25 percent of all buyers – put no money down.

* In California, 60 percent of all new mortgages this year are interest-only or negative-amortization.

* House prices in relation to rent have hit all-time highs in the US, Britain, Australia, New Zealand, France, Spain, the Netherlands, Ireland and Belgium.
In the US, the ratio is 35 percent above its 1975-2000 average. The price to rent ratio is a cardinal indicator of over valuation.

*** Investors have before them an opportunity as extraordinary as the financial bubble before them. That the bubble will disappear someday is a certainty. That it will blow up catastrophically is a fair bet. And thanks to the delusions of their fellow investors, they now have a way to make that bet with the odds in their favour. While the risk of a monumental meltdown, explosion, or collapse has never been greater, the price of risk-protection has never been lower. Put options are cheap. It is as if they were about to embark on a long march across a hot desert and there beside the road was someone selling spring water at a discount. Readers might want to buy some.

Another way to look at it is this: the cost of NOT holding stocks is also at a near-record low. There has been no price appreciation in the Dow for about 8 years. Had you bought in 1998, you would have paid about as much for a stock as you would today. But neither is there much in the way of dividend yield – averaging only around 2%. You can get 4.83% from a three-month T-bill. You can get 4.79% (yes, the yield curve is upside down) from a 10-year T-note. In either case, you get more than 2% greater yield by NOT taking the risk of being in common stocks.

And what about gold? Yesterday, the price of gold fell almost $17, to $624. What this signals to us is that the gold market is still correcting and may slip below $600 again before this phase is over. We hope so; we'd like to buy more and still have $600 as our target price.

But will gold pay off when the housing bubble deflates? We don't know. Maybe not soon. Maybe not much. What gold protects against is what happens after the housing bubble collapses and desperate homeowners demand that the government 'do something' to keep them from getting what they've got coming. Then, in reaction if not anticipation, we expect the real excitement to begin.

*** The International Herald Tribune reported recently that the savings rate for people under the age of 35 in the US is MINUS 16%. At that rate, their debt doubles every 4.5 years.

Pittsburgh correspondent Byron King sends this note from an American friend:

"One of my colleagues - a professor of chemistry for Christ's sakes - just completed a massive blunder. He and his wife earn probably about $110K per year. (He's one of the relatively low paid members of the department and she works in a day-care facility.) In any event, he inherits $800K from his father. Rather than treating this as a form of financial stabilization capable of kicking out $40K per year of nominal dollars if he conservatively invests it, he goes and gets a $500K mortgage and builds himself a $1.3 million house. Now his mortgage payments and taxes - huge taxes - consume approximately 70% of his gross income. He went from enhanced stability to probably fatal debt spiral because of one fateful decision. And this is one of the smart guys."


Regards,

Bill Bonner
The Daily Reckoning

http://www.dailyreckoning.co.uk/article/080920061.html
_________________
40 propuestas por una Vivienda Digna
Volver arriba
Ver perfil de usuario Enviar mensaje privado
Mostrar mensajes de anteriores:   
Publicar nuevo tema   Responder al tema    Foros de discusión -> English speaking message board Todas las horas son GMT + 1 Hora
Página 1 de 1

 
Cambiar a:  
Puede publicar nuevos temas en este foro
No puede responder a temas en este foro
No puede editar sus mensajes en este foro
No puede borrar sus mensajes en este foro
No puede votar en encuestas en este foro



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2008 phpBB Group